Defending Those Who Defend Us®

Commander’s Disposition Options

A wide spectrum of options for disposing of criminal allegations is available to Commanding Officers/Generals. During the initial investigative stages, a Commanding Officer/General must weigh the seriousness of the misconduct with other factors, such as:

  • military character of the accused
  • length of service of the accused
  • inconvenience to the command
  • military necessity
  • operational tempo
  • the good order and discipline of the unit

For example, the Commanding Officer/General may decide not to prefer charges because the alleged misconduct is not overly serious and would be disproportionately disruptive to the command.

Typically, a Commanding Officer/General has four options when disposing alleged misconduct:

  1. Court-martial (e.g., general court-martial, special court-martial);
  2. Administrative hearing (e.g., Article 15, summary court-martial, discharge board);
  3. Formal counseling placed in the service record book of the accused;
  4. No action at all, if the allegations seem warrantless.

Contact our military lawyers today to get help.

Military Justice Attorneys

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Join our mailing list to receive the latest news and updates from our team.

You have Successfully Subscribed!