
Adverse Counselings Rebuttals
An adverse counseling such as a 6105-entry, Letter of Reprimand, or Letter of Caution can severely damage a servicemember’s military record and affect their potential for reenlistment, promotion, and career advancement. Such counselings are often used as the basis for administrative separation proceedings, relief for cause, or other adverse personnel actions.
Military Justice Attorneys is experienced in helping servicemembers rebut false or unsupported allegations in adverse counselings and then working to get those counselings removed from their military records. Call us today for your consultation.
What is an Adverse Counseling, and Why is a Rebuttal Necessary?
Adverse counseling is a formal documentation issued by a supervisor or commander to address a performance issue, misconduct, or behavior that requires correction. It often includes details about the issue, expected improvements, and potential consequences if the issue persists.
A rebuttal is sometimes helpful because it provides the individual receiving the counseling an opportunity to explain their side of the story, clarify any inaccuracies, or dispute unfair allegations. Without a rebuttal, the counseling may stand unchallenged, potentially influencing performance evaluations, promotions, or even disciplinary actions. A well-crafted rebuttal ensures your perspective is included in the official record and demonstrates that you are proactive and professional in addressing concerns.
Rebutting an adverse counseling is not always in a service member’s best interest, however, and may be counterproductive or even make matters worse. A service member should consult an experienced attorney before deciding whether to rebut an adverse counseling.
How Should I Rebut an Adverse Counseling?
When writing a rebuttal, it’s essential to remain professional, factual, and concise. Start by acknowledging the counseling and stating your intention to provide your perspective. You may choose to address each point raised in the counseling, using evidence or examples to support your claims, or strategically address only certain points. It’s typically best to void emotional or confrontational language, as this could undermine the credibility of your response. If any of the assertions in the counseling are incorrect, an effective rebuttal will, provide a clear and factual refutation of the allegation with supporting evidence. Proofread your rebuttal carefully before submitting it, as errors could reflect poorly on your professionalism. Deciding on the appropriate tone and content of a rebuttal is highly specific. An experienced attorney can help you decide whether a rebuttal is appropriate in your specific case and, if so, what to include.
What Should I Avoid When Submitting a Rebuttal?
If you have consulted with an attorney and choose to submit a response, avoid being defensive, confrontational, or overly emotional in your rebuttal, as these approaches can escalate tensions and reduce the impact of your response. Refrain from making unsupported accusations or personal attacks, as these can reflect poorly on your character and professionalism. Additionally, avoid including irrelevant information or lengthy narratives that do not directly address the points in the adverse counseling. Keep the rebuttal focused, organized, and relevant. Clearly state the relief you are requesting and cite to the legal authority and any supporting cases that support your request.
What Happens After I Submit My Rebuttal to Adverse Counseling?
After submitting your rebuttal, it typically becomes part of your official record alongside the adverse counseling. Your supervisor or the individual who issued the counseling may review your response and choose to address any inaccuracies or concerns you’ve raised. Depending on the nature of the counseling and rebuttal, there might be follow-up discussions, clarifications, or adjustments to the original counseling document. In some cases, your rebuttal may prompt further investigations if the situation involves conflicting perspectives. It is crucial to remain professional throughout the process, as your attitude and actions can influence the outcome.
Can Adverse Counseling Impact My Career If I Submit a Rebuttal?
Submitting a rebuttal does not inherently harm your career; in fact, it can demonstrate your willingness to communicate openly and resolve issues. A well-written, professional rebuttal shows that you are serious about your responsibilities and care about your reputation. However, adverse counseling documentation, with or without a rebuttal, can potentially influence performance evaluations, promotions, or disciplinary actions. Submitting a rebuttal helps ensure your side of the story is documented, which could mitigate potential negative impacts. The key is to approach the rebuttal process thoughtfully and professionally, as this can leave a positive impression even in a challenging situation.
How Can I Ensure My Rebuttal is Taken Seriously?
To ensure your rebuttal is taken seriously, focus on clarity, professionalism, and factual accuracy. Provide specific examples, dates, and supporting evidence to back up your claims, as this strengthens your credibility. Use respectful and constructive language, even if you disagree with the counseling’s content. It is best practice to always seek advice from an experienced military justice attorney before drafting or submitting a rebuttal. A well-prepared rebuttal shows you are serious about resolving the issue and maintaining a positive working relationship.
How Can Military Justice Attorneys Help with an Adverse Counseling Rebuttal?
At Military Justice Attorneys, we understand how an adverse counseling can impact your career and future opportunities. Our experienced team is here to guide you through the process of crafting a strong, professional rebuttal. We can help you analyze the counseling for inaccuracies, gather supporting evidence, and ensure your response is clear, concise, and compelling. By working with us, you gain the advantage of having legal professionals who understand military regulations and the unique challenges of military service. Our goal is to protect your rights, preserve your reputation, and advocate for your best interests. Let us stand with you to ensure your voice is heard and your record is as accurate and fair as possible.

What Our Clients Say
-
"He is an articulate pitbull in the courtroom."
My career, my life, my future was completely in his hands and he took it as seriously as I did. He is an articulate pitbull in the courtroom. I highly recommend his services if you expect to have any chance of seeing the justice you truly deserve.
- Corporal, USMC -
"It Was Like a Scene From a Movie"
The results I received from the board was the best possible outcome in my favor and saved my career and my family’s future.
- Master Sergeant, USAF -
"I trusted him with my career on the line, and he was outstanding."
Mr. Hill tore apart the government's theory piece by piece . . . I trusted him with my career on the line, and he was outstanding.
- Petty Officer Third Class, USN -
"I would not want my fate in anyone else’s hands."
Gerry Healy is an outstanding attorney. In the courtroom he is confident, knowledgeable, and aggressive. I would not want my fate in anyone else’s hands.
- Airman First Class, USAF -
"Mr. Hodge was relentless in his defense of me"
Mr. Hodge was relentless in his defense. . . and absolved me of any wrongdoing under the UCMJ.
- Corporal, USMC

Our Battles Won
Results Matter. When your career, reputation, and freedom are on the line, you need an experienced law firm in your corner. With more than 75 years of combined legal experience, the attorneys at MJA know how to fight and win. Our results speak for themselves.
-
"NOT GUILTY"
Fort Cavazos, Texas. Army Staff Sergeant Acquitted of Murder at General Court-Martial After Deadly Shooting Incident in Texas.
-
"NOT GUILTY" "NOT GUILTY"
Quantico, Virginia. Marine Corporal (E-4) Acquitted at Court-Martial of Wrongful Drug Use After Positive Urinalysis.
-
"NO BASIS"
Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickman, Hawaii. Administrative Discharge Board Finds “No Basis” for Alleged Senior Leader Misconduct.
-
"NOT GUILTY" Fort Cavazos, Texas
Fort Hood, Texas. Army Private Second Class (E-2) Acquitted of Rape and Sexual Assault Charges After Week-Long Trial.
-
"NOT GUILTY" Parris Island, South Carolina
Parris Island, South Carolina. Marine Staff Sergeant (E-6) Acquitted at Court-Martial of Hazing, Blood Striping, and Pinning.
-
"NOT GUILTY" "NOT GUILTY"
Kings Bay, Georgia. Navy Master-at-Arms Found Not Guilty of Unholstering Firearm and Pointing it at Another Sailor.
-
"NOT GUILTY" "NOT GUILTY"
Spangdahlem Air Base, Germany. Senior Airman (E-4) Accused of Rape and Abusive Sexual Contact Acquitted by Military Judge.